UTILITARIANISM AND EXPECTED UTILITY: When Doing Good Requires Living With Uncertainty, and Choosing With the Best of What We Can Know

We want to do good.

To ease suffering.

To increase joy.

To make the kind of choices

that leave the world lighter than we found it.


But life rarely hands us certainty.


We cannot know all the consequences.

We cannot predict all the ripples.

We cannot see the future.


And so we reach for something

to help us choose wisely

despite the fog.


We reach for expected utility.


The quiet idea

that even when we don’t know the outcome,

we can choose the path

most likely to bring about

the greatest good.


It is where utilitarianism meets uncertainty—

not as enemies,

but as partners

in the careful art

of ethical living.





What Is Expected Utility?



Expected utility asks us

to weigh outcomes not just by their goodness,

but by their probability.


It says:

Don’t just ask what could happen—

ask how likely it is.


A small chance at great joy

may be worth more

than a sure but minor comfort.


A likely harm

may outweigh a distant hope.


This is not about cold numbers.

It is about wise risk.

It is about choosing in a world

that refuses to be predictable.


And it is one of the most human things we do.





Utilitarianism in a World Without Guarantees



Utilitarianism asks:

What will create the most happiness?

What will reduce the most pain?


But rarely can we know these things for sure.


So expected utility helps.

It gives us a compass—

not perfect,

but pointed.


It helps us choose

when the future is not a map

but a sky of possibilities.


  • Should I donate to this cause
    even if I can’t track every impact?
  • Should I speak up in this meeting,
    hoping it might change something?



We do not need certainty.

We need reasonable care

with the unknown.





The Risk of Caring



To use expected utility well

is to live with a kind of moral humility.


We will not always be right.

Sometimes we’ll help less than we hoped.

Sometimes we’ll hurt more than we meant.


But still,

we choose.


Because choosing with care,

even amid uncertainty,

is better than choosing with indifference.


It’s not perfection we seek—

but alignment.


With our values.

With our intentions.

With the lives our choices touch.





When the Math Is Not Enough



Expected utility can guide.

But it cannot see everything.


It cannot always account

for dignity,

for justice,

for sacredness.


Some outcomes matter

not because they are likely,

but because they reflect who we are.


And some harms

should not be risked—

no matter how unlikely.


So even as we estimate and weigh,

we must also listen

to the quiet voice of conscience.


Because ethics lives not only

in calculation—

but in care.





A Closing Reflection



If you find yourself facing a choice

with no clear outcome,

pause.


Ask:


  • What are the possible futures this choice could bring?
  • Which outcomes matter most—not just in scale,
    but in meaning?
  • Am I willing to choose,
    knowing I do not know everything?



Because doing good

is not about knowing the end—

it is about walking

with intention

into the uncertainty.




And in the end, utilitarianism and expected utility remind us

that ethics is not a science of certainty,

but a practice of thoughtful hope.

That we can honor both reason and risk,

both probability and principle.

And that when we choose with care,

even in the dark,

we become part of a deeper light—

not because we know the future,

but because we dare to meet it

with kindness,

wisdom,

and the gentle courage

to try.